Our Economic Recovery Plan
To address the current economic crisis, we propose a Main Street Recovery Program, a substantial, strategic and sustained plan for economic renewal. It calls for a $900 billion investment over the next two years to boost the real economy and lay the foundation for long-term restructuring.
» Read the "Main Street Recovery Program" | List of endorsers | Podcast | Analysis and commentary | Discuss our Main Street Recovery Plan on Change.gov
What We Must Have
An economic stimulus must be substantial in order to succeed. Economists are coming to agreement that small measures won't budge America's $15 trillion economy. China recently announced a $586 billion stimulus program, planning to invest 7 percent of that country's gross domestic product a year for two years. To lift this economy, an American plan needs to invest at least 3 percent of gross domestic product, or $450 billion, a year for two years.
Public investments must be strategic to be effective. Both tax cuts and bailouts for the rich are ineffective means for stimulating our economy. We need to avert mass layoffs, create new jobs, and build infrastructure that will increase America's productivity. The most effective plan would:
- reduce dependence on foreign oil and address global warming,
- repair our crumbling bridges, roads, and levees,
- provide aid to states so they can avoid layoffs and continue to provide needed services,
- increase aid to education,
- expand research and development,
- tackle the health care crisis, and
- provide aid to those most in need.
Our recovery program must be sustained to build a strong economy. Lifting us out of recession is vital, but not sufficient. America needs a long-term effort to build an economy, not based on asset bubbles and rampant speculation, but on sustained, balanced growth.
The Latest: An Economy for All
New Unemployment, Old Solutions
By Eric Lotke - Nov 6, 2009

Today’s unemployment data contain gloomy news. Gloomy, but expected. The interpretation of the data is even worse. read more »
Message To Energy Department: U.S. Greenbacks For U.S. Green Jobs
By Isaiah J. Poole - Nov 6, 2009

News of the potential use of U.S. read more »
It's Not About What Congress Does, But What It Delivers
- Nov 6, 2009
From openleft.com
When most voters believe their lives are getting better, then the party in power will benefit politically. Ideological abstractions about the size of government or appealing to the base don't matter quite as much. It really is about delivering the goods. The smart post-election political argument for a governing party should be about what policies they can pass that will improve people's lives, not about how to appeal to voters on a more abstract level. read more » Obama Faces His Anzio
- Nov 6, 2009
From The New York Times
Remember those Republican boasts that they would turn health care into President Obama’s Waterloo? Well, exit polls suggest that to the extent that health care was an issue in Tuesday’s elections, it worked in Democrats’ favor. But while health care won’t be Mr. Obama’s Waterloo, economic policy is starting to look like his Anzio. read more » We Are What We Trade and How We Trade It
- Nov 6, 2009
From truthdig.com
In 2009, trade and globalization have transcended their “old economy” ghetto and become central to the “new economy,” health care and even the Earth’s very survival. read more » Green Shoots. For Whom?
By Eric Lotke - Nov 5, 2009

Today’s “Productivity and Costs” data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics contain what looks like good news. But keep the cork in the bottles. read more » The Blue Dog Dems Are in Danger
- Nov 5, 2009
From salon.com
If Congress doesn't go after unemployment, some conservative Democrats are going to lose their jobs read more » One Year After Obama's Election: Still Smarter...Than The Alternative
- Nov 5, 2009
From Huffington Post
Imagine where we'd be now with President John "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" McCain, and Vice President Sarah (shudder) Palin. Each and every time you get disappointed in President Obama, or disagree with something he says or does, ask yourself: "How would this discussion be different if McCain had won?" read more »
