Taxes


Dave Johnson's picture

A New Economy from Old Roots?

How do we build a new economy out of the collapse of the old economy? How do we start fresh to begin creating jobs again, while building in economic and environmental sustainability, as well as workplaces that respect human needs and rights? read more »

More »»


Dave Johnson's picture

Who Else is Against American Manufacturing? III

"A country’s economic power comes from manufacturing. But while other countries have industrial policies, America has a de-inustrialization policy. read more »

More »»


Roger Hickey's picture

Don't Tax Benefits

Americans are demanding health care reform that guarantees them quality, affordable insurance, reduces the burden of health costs on employers and individuals and provides backup coverage through a public health insurance option.

read more »

More »»

Progressive Revenue Options to Fund Health Care Reform

There are straightforward ways to raise revenue that will not be overly burdensome for taxpayers and which will not harm the economy. They involve eliminating or reducing several subsidies and preferences provided in the federal tax code to the wealthiest and most powerful among us. Combined with savings in the existing health care system, these measures could raise enough revenue to adequately fund health care reform. read more »

Daniel McLeod
Hometown: Northampton, MA
Interests: federal budget, Military, Politics, Tax Day, Taxes
Honors: 1
Isaiah J. Poole's picture

Some Tax Facts You Won't Hear At A Tax Protest

Anti-tax protesters are often grossly misled about federal tax burdens and how the tax system has been rigged to favor the very people who are orchestrating false populist anger. Some facts:

  • An April 2009 Gallup poll found that 61 percent of respondents felt that the federal income tax they will have to pay this year is “fair.”
  • Thirty-nine percent of respondents with incomes below $30,000 said that they thought the federal income taxes they pay are “too high.” Says a Citizens for Tax Justice study, "This is remarkable, because only 32 percent of taxpayers in this income group will pay any income tax at all on their 2008 income." The remainder will pay an average of 2.6 percent of their earnings in federal income taxes.
  • Tax burdens on middle-class families are already at their lowest levels in decades, according to a Center for Budget and Policy Priorities report and "Tax Policy Center data. Households in the middle fifth of the income spectrum paid an average of 14.2 percent of their income in federal taxes in 2006.
  • But the tax burden for those at the very top—like the people who bankrolled the April 15 Tax Day protests—have fallen even farther, according to economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez. And they've gotten a disproportionate benefit from conservative tax policies. Almost one-fourth of the benefit of the the Bush administration tax cuts by 2010 will have gone to the 0.3 percent of households with incomes of more than $1 million per year, according to the Tax Policy Center. Less than one-sixth of the total value of the tax cuts will go to the bottom 60 percent of households.

Robert Borosage's picture

Taxing Matters

Fox News is flogging Astroturf "tea parties" underwritten by corporate lobbyists. The Wall Street Journal editorializes about the evils of the estate tax. Ari Fleischer, Daddy Bush's old flack, complains that "redistribution of income" through the tax code "is getting out of hand." Really? Here's the grim reality.

More »»


Eric Lotke's picture

April 15: The Issue Is Fairness, Not Taxes

When tax rates were steep, executives had more incentive to leave money in the company —investing for future growth, sharing with staff or hiring more people. Nowadays, with taxes so low, CEOs have more incentive simply to pay themselves. That’s a recipe for greed, not growth.

More »»

Gilded Age Taxation

Who pays taxes, and who reaps the benefits of an unfair tax code? Income inequality between 1980 and 2006 has gone up 144 percent between the top one percent of taxpayers and the middle 60 percent, even as top-end tax rates have declined 15 percent for the top one percent during that same period. This is the result of bad policy choices that can be reversed. This report explains how three decades of tax policy have led to Gilded Age inequality and outlines some steps to make the tax code more progressive. read more »

Small Business Tax Hoax

CONservative Spin:

“President Obama's budget proposal would increase taxes on a large percentage of small businesses. ”
Isaiah J. Poole's picture

PROgressive Response:

In fact, according to the Tax Policy Center's table of 2007 tax returns that reported small-business income, 481,000 of those returns—about 2 percent—are in the top two income tax brackets, which include all filers with taxable incomes that would be affected by Obama's proposals to let portions of the Bush tax cuts for wealthy taxpayers expire and to reduce the tax rate at which families making more than $250,000 could take itemized deductions.

Even though only two percent of people who are classified as small-business owners would see a tax increase under President Obama's policies, Media Matters reports that many media figures and outlets—including CNBC host Joe Kernen, CNBC host Maria Bartiromo, ABC News' Jake Tapper, CNN's Dana Bash, Fox News' Sean Hannity, CNN's David Gergen, Politico, the Associated Press, The Washington Post, and The New York Times—have advanced, uncritically repeated, or failed to challenge the debunked Republican falsehood that Obama's income tax proposals would increase taxes on a large percentage of small businesses. For example, Kernen didn't challenge Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., on the March 26 edition of CNBC's Squawk Box after Gregg referred to Obama's proposal as a "tax policy that basically is focused on raising taxes on small businesses especially."

 Source